-
Website
http://blog.disqus.com/ -
Original page
-
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
donnacha | WordSkill
37 comments · 12 points
-
Jason
164 comments · 22 points
-
Daniel Ha
2198 comments · 435 points
-
Rob Loach
45 comments · 29 points
-
goodbloke01
95 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Disqus: The Official Blog - Stocking Stuffers: Blogger Sync, Improved Reactions and Spam Reporting.
2 weeks ago · 48 comments
-
DISQUS | Service Status - Facebook Connect Temporarily Unavailable
15 hours ago · 1 comment
-
DISQUS | Service Status - Everything is running normal
3 weeks ago · 16 comments
-
Disqus: The Official Blog - Vote + Comment on your Favorite X-mas flick at BBC's Radio Times!
3 weeks ago · 12 comments
-
Disqus: The Official Blog - Please Welcome paidContent to the Disqus Community!
4 weeks ago · 15 comments
-
Disqus: The Official Blog - Stocking Stuffers: Blogger Sync, Improved Reactions and Spam Reporting.
Any news on this, Disqus? A "yay" or "nay" either way would be nice? :)
Giannii
DISQUS
Community Manager
help@disqus.com
http://twitter.com/disqus
Giannii
DISQUS
Community Manager
help@disqus.com
http://twitter.com/disqus
And filtering the reactions group is a great idea too!
Another option is to mix the trackbacks with the comments - I am in favor of this one, since in a way trackbacks supposedly add to the conversation as opposed to the Reactions which are majorly "Re-tweets".
Having said that, the best way would be to filter out "non-reactions" (like Re-Tweets) and real "reactions". Real reactions together with trackback should be mixed with the "Comments" group since these are all part of the discussion.
While "non-reactions" like Re-Tweets can stay where they are "reactions".
Finally, maybe a different name than "reactions" since it sounds like "comments" (which again, mainly are "re-tweets", not really "reactions").
Anyway, I hope I'm not confusing :p (English is not my native language)
Thanks again and more power!!