-
Website
http://blog.disqus.com/ -
Original page
http://blog.disqus.net/2009/07/13/outside-the-echo-chamber-comments-alive-and-well/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
donnacha | WordSkill
37 comments · 12 points
-
Jason
164 comments · 22 points
-
Daniel Ha
2198 comments · 435 points
-
Rob Loach
45 comments · 29 points
-
goodbloke01
95 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
Disqus: The Official Blog - Stocking Stuffers: Blogger Sync, Improved Reactions and Spam Reporting.
2 weeks ago · 48 comments
-
DISQUS | Service Status - Facebook Connect Temporarily Unavailable
14 hours ago · 1 comment
-
DISQUS | Service Status - Everything is running normal
3 weeks ago · 16 comments
-
Disqus: The Official Blog - Vote + Comment on your Favorite X-mas flick at BBC's Radio Times!
3 weeks ago · 12 comments
-
Disqus: The Official Blog - Please Welcome paidContent to the Disqus Community!
4 weeks ago · 15 comments
-
Disqus: The Official Blog - Stocking Stuffers: Blogger Sync, Improved Reactions and Spam Reporting.
Generally, I would like to have that ability. That is, by having a summary of reactions instead of listing all of them (or to have the choice to choose between both), such as:
"Reactions"
"(26) On Twitter | (5) On Facebook | (3) On FriendFeed"
Etc. It would give people an indication that there is buzz occurring elsewhere (goes for social proof and induces deeper conversation, and not just for egotistical purposes), and people can do a search to find those reactions if they choose to know more about what's being said.
Plus, it also feeds the egotistical nature if one so chooses. You simply have a total number of comments/reactions/tracbacks on other platforms, without having to list them all.
Also, it would be nice to have middle-ground. For example, a summary count, and possibly including the text of the first/original tweet/reaction. (Especially if a reaction is merely a "retweet" of the original.)
That way, you give a taste of the reaction, but without listing a litany of reactions that makes everything noisy.
My 3 cents.
I would like to add, an option wherein we can choose or filter out which "reactions" will show as part of the "comments" flow. For example, most Friendfeed "reactions" are discussions and are better off as part of the "comments" flow.
Trackbacks can also be considered as worth being part of the "comments" flow than being at the very bottom (if I'm not mistaken it is after the "reactions" section - which makes trackbacks much more useless :p )
Third, the current "reactions" implementation are mostly just "re-" this and re-that - ie. re-tweet; re-post; and so on. Most of these are not really "reactions" per se, looking at Mashable being the most updated "reactions"-enabled website, it looks like spam and only adds to the load time of the site and of Disqus.
These "re-" stuff should be collapsed down as suggested above "(26) Twitter | (5) Facebook" and so on.
Fourth, a change of terminologies used. "Reactions" is no different from "Comments". Second argument, the current content of "reactions" are well, as I mentioned earlier, "re-this" and "re-that", or the "Re-" Spams. These are not "reactions" at all ;)
And well, again the trackbacks are much better to be placed on top or as part of the "Comments" section/flow.
^_^
Those are my suggestions :D
like In blogs, it show the comments count same way it should show the reaction count from different services and it should be a drop down menu style so if people wanna see twitter reaction or friend feed reaction or wanna see comments that people did in Google Reader by using the Google reader's social feature etc..
Backtype, uberVU, trailfire, instacomment cocomments or other tools like seesmic for vedio comments all things are good but need a way to place them properly..
and people can comment or react on anything..it could be a nice photo, a nice video, a nice blogpost, a nice audio, a nice website, a nice thought in short it can be anything so JS-Kit, announced “[blog] comments are dead.” I think that never gonna be never gonna dead. Only the way of giving comments is changed..
so Is email dead? mean whatever social networking tool or site you're using after all all things managed by just an email, from opening an account to getting alerts and the list is too long so like this comments never going to dead.
Now a days commenting having a added values. People do use all form of style to do commenting like text, audio, video and now a days also using ratings and "Like" feature similar to facebook. these all ways to give reaction to something.
i think Disqus should add "on the fly commenting" mean to say if i like a image or if i like a video or if i like a web page or a blogpost or a document, anything i like I just need to post my reaction whether they using Disqus or not..and it would be great if I can do comments in a particular part of a webpage..If I like a part of some image then i should able to post the comment for particular that part so other can know that i like that thing too much..
when we need to see that how many comments we got on particular page then we should get it via a bookmarklet that show the page reaction and comments or a widget on website where i can click and expend it and able to see all the reaction whether its from twitter, disqus, facebook or friendfeed or IM service or email.
In a way what I mean is - imbed the disqus comment thread in all places and irrespective of where they are typed, they show up in every other location.
I love Disqus. These days social media is moving fast and blogs need to keep up with these trends. I hope Disqus can help that happen by continuing to innovate "comments" into Disqussions no matter where they occur.
AND, if you can figure out how to do this in a way that continues to drive traffic to the author's blog and give them Page Rank for all the links as well then you'll have truly monetized the service.
* Retweets are *usually* just noise. With exceptions
* Friendfeed comments can add much value to conversations
One solutions could be to GROUP identical retweets (you already sort of do that) and THREAD Friendfeed comments pulled from the same source. Of course those are just two examples, each social service has its own personality.
Mixing Reactions and Comments is the right thing if you ask me. Just, do it properly. If you are really interested I can provide use cases and further ideas.
Rock on ;)
You can have just as much crap from the so-called social sites. I get hit with all kinds of email from another site that can only be called spam, but because it's a "social" site it's different? You can have a helpful dialog commenting on blogs just as much as on social sites.
One time I was reading product reviews on newegg.com. Somebody asked a question because he was having difficulty setting up a microphone on his PC. Another customer posted a response with very detailed instructions that couldn't be found on the manufacturer's site.
Now that's quality and it wasn't on a social site. It was basically two people "commenting" on a blog-type section of the site.
Commenting isn't dead. It's just becoming a part of an ever growing network.
Take care,
JC
Twitter comments are almost always "RT @wolfire new blog post (insert title here) (insert bitly link here)". At best, there is like a 10 word summary that adds zero value to the discussion.
Reddit comments tend to be dominated by long pun threads or questions along the lines of "Why do we care about this game?" and then lengthy arguments about why we do or do not suck.
YouTube comments are just... soul crushing. They really should just never be read by anybody.
In other words, these reactions have virtually no pertinent value because they are taken in a completely different context. They just make your real, legitimate comments more difficult to read.
My suggestion would be to treat various social media sites like "smart" trackbacks, where you see that it has been submitted to Digg or Reddit and then can upvote it / digg it from there, and expand it and read the comments inline if you wish.
It would be even cooler if there was a call to action to submit to Twitter, Facebook, etc. which would be like an amazing version of ShareThis.
It's the same with a plugin to import Menéame comments (in a Spanish Digg) to WP, the talks are separate from another so that the noise which would be catastrophic wardrobe.
I haven't come across anyone else (that I know personally) using BackType.com along with Disqus. I'm using it for the reasons mention by Michel: choice of re-publishing. And they (BackType) make it dead-simple with links to Reply, Original, Permalink, Tweet -- right under the comment. Simple! The only thing I don't like about BackType is it is a bit slow to grab all the comments from various places around the web and drop them into your profile -- especially comments on blogs that incorporate Disqus. This is a bit disconcerting, given Disqus' comment above "...and are now also working with our friends at BackType, to bring reactions to all publishers using Disqus."
I, too, would like to see intuitive integration, that is, both with BackType and within the Disqus control panel.
What's annoying is that my own tweet of the blog posting and my own tweets of comment replies as well as other's tweets of comment replies are showing up in the reactions list, which is, ultimately, a waste of space and very confusing. Disqus/backtype should be able to filter these out.
http://www.computerstar.ca/
http://www.computerstar.ca/
http://www.computerstar.ca/